Skip to content

[DOC] Clarify imprecise reference to example #144219

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
gabriel-1607 wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+1 −1
Open

[DOC] Clarify imprecise reference to example #144219

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
8d751c7
Imprecise reference to example corrected
gabriel-1607 Jan 25, 2026
4e3d752
Simpler clarification of the reference
gabriel-1607 Jan 25, 2026
78e4a53
Merge branch 'main' into patch-1
gabriel-1607 Jan 25, 2026
3e31bd0
Merge branch 'main' into patch-1
gabriel-1607 Jan 26, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Doc/tutorial/classes.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ function that "belongs to" an object.

Valid method names of an instance object depend on its class. By definition,
all attributes of a class that are function objects define corresponding
methods of its instances. So in our example, ``x.f`` is a valid method
methods of its instances. So in our :ref:`previous example <tut-classobjects>`, ``x.f`` is a valid method
reference, since ``MyClass.f`` is a function, but ``x.i`` is not, since
``MyClass.i`` is not. But ``x.f`` is not the same thing as ``MyClass.f`` --- it
is a *method object*, not a function object.
Expand Down
Loading