Upgrade offline version of html-ui archetypes to 0.41

[dukescript]

This PR fixes #8587 by upgrading the maven archetypes version from 0.23 to 0.41. The change affects project creation in offline mode. When online the wizard automatically uses the latest version:
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.dukescript.archetype/pom/0.41
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.dukescript.archetype/crud4j-archetype/0.41
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.dukescript.archetype/visual-archetype/0.41

---

^Add meaningful description above

Click to collapse/expand PR instructions

By opening a pull request you confirm that, unless explicitly stated otherwise, the changes -

• are all your own work, and you have the right to contribute them.
• are contributed solely under the terms and conditions of the Apache License 2.0 (see section 5 of the license for more information).

Please make sure (eg. git log) that all commits have a valid name and email address for you in the Author field.

If you're a first time contributor, see the Contributing guidelines for more information.

If you're a committer, please label the PR before pressing "Create pull request" so that the right test jobs can run.

PR approval and merge checklist:

1. Was this PR correctly labeled, did the right tests run? When did they run?
2. Is this PR squashed?
3. Are author name / email address correct? Are co-authors correctly listed? Do the commit messages need updates?
4. Does the PR title and description still fit after the Nth iteration? Is the description sufficient to appear in the release notes?

If this PR targets the delivery branch: don't merge. (full wiki article)

[neilcsmith-net]

Please don't open issues if you have a PR ready to submit.

As you're on the PMC, please make sure your GitHub account is currently linked up with your Apache account.

[jtulach]

Glad to see some activity over all those years. Thanks.

[jtulach]

Is this PR squashed?

If the CI checks turn out green, I'd like to merge this single commit by pressing "Merge pull request".

• Because it is a single commit, there is no need to squash, right?
• The commit info mentions Toni Epple and one of his email addresses. It seems acceptable to me.

Opinions? Objections? References to guidelines I'd violate by pressing the "Merge pull request" button?

[dukescript]

Please don't open issues if you have a PR ready to submit.

As you're on the PMC, please make sure your GitHub account is currently linked up with your Apache account.

I will try to remember. In my other projects it is "due process" to never create a PR without creating/referencing an issue.

[mbien]

Opinions? Objections? References to guidelines I'd violate by pressing the "Merge pull request" button?

@jtulach the patch looks fine to me (but I haven't tested it!). Whether thats the right account (doesn't look like its linked to apache?) or email i don't really know. But for the small changeset it probably isn't super important. (Merging anonymous contributions is something we should avoid though)

[jtulach]

https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/0abab2a2f0c34224f8dcafdf7079632e787ef36e.patch now indicates

From 0abab2a2f0c34224f8dcafdf7079632e787ef36e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anton Epple <toni.epple@eppleton.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 08:29:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] refs #8587 upgrade offline version of html-ui archetypes to 0.41

Toni seems to be listed at https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?unix=netbeans - I ask him to merge himself.

[neilcsmith-net]

Sure, Toni is a committer and on the PMC, so asking him to merge himself would prove the merging account is correctly linked up. I commented primarily because I noticed the CI needed manually starting. It should start automatically if the PR is opened by a committer.